IDA ACTION ALERTS
1. Stop Horse Massacre in National Wildlife Refuge
Tell U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service to protect horses, not slaughter
them
Displaying a gross misuse of power and a fundamental failure to
fulfill their conservation mandate, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (FWS) has gone ahead with their plan to remove as many as
1,200 wild horses living in Nevada's Sheldon National Wildlife
Refuge. FWS has done this without allowing the public to comment on
their plan even though the horses were removed from federally-owned
land at taxpayers' expense. Many of these horses are being "adopted"
in groups by horse brokers who will then send them to
slaughterhouses.
FWS claims the horses' removal is necessary to preserve the water
supply for antelope and sage grouse -- two species that happen to
bring revenue to the state from fees for special hunting permits.
Their intent is to increase the populations of these animals so that
hunters will have more animals to shoot. However, FWS based their
plan on an outdated environmental study done in 1978, and has so far
refused to conduct a legally-required Environmental Assessment to
scientifically justify the horses' removal. A more recent study done
by FWS determined that wild horses can live sustainably with
antelope and sage grouse in the refuge.
( Read more... )
1. Stop Horse Massacre in National Wildlife Refuge
Tell U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service to protect horses, not slaughter
them
Displaying a gross misuse of power and a fundamental failure to
fulfill their conservation mandate, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (FWS) has gone ahead with their plan to remove as many as
1,200 wild horses living in Nevada's Sheldon National Wildlife
Refuge. FWS has done this without allowing the public to comment on
their plan even though the horses were removed from federally-owned
land at taxpayers' expense. Many of these horses are being "adopted"
in groups by horse brokers who will then send them to
slaughterhouses.
FWS claims the horses' removal is necessary to preserve the water
supply for antelope and sage grouse -- two species that happen to
bring revenue to the state from fees for special hunting permits.
Their intent is to increase the populations of these animals so that
hunters will have more animals to shoot. However, FWS based their
plan on an outdated environmental study done in 1978, and has so far
refused to conduct a legally-required Environmental Assessment to
scientifically justify the horses' removal. A more recent study done
by FWS determined that wild horses can live sustainably with
antelope and sage grouse in the refuge.
( Read more... )